<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prince Loses Points: DMCA Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomkitty.net/blog/2007/11/26/prince-loses-points-dmca-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomkitty.net/blog/2007/11/26/prince-loses-points-dmca-nonsense/</link>
	<description>you know the drill</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.randomkitty.net/blog/2007/11/26/prince-loses-points-dmca-nonsense/#comment-14447</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomkitty.net/blog/2007/11/26/prince-loses-points-dmca-nonsense/#comment-14447</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the song plays only an incidental part in the clip - it's background noise. It's obvious that anyone wanting to consume the music would get it from a better source than this, thus it constitutes no threat to the copyright holder's sales. I don't see how they could claim that any damage has been done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the song plays only an incidental part in the clip - it&#8217;s background noise. It&#8217;s obvious that anyone wanting to consume the music would get it from a better source than this, thus it constitutes no threat to the copyright holder&#8217;s sales. I don&#8217;t see how they could claim that any damage has been done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
