Twitter Updates for 2008-04-05

  • @bloggersblog hear hear, viva la literature! #
  • Gah. I wake up to an internet fight over twitter. that’s like waking up & walking into a bar argument #
  • pro baseball? overpaid children. for most people, the local bar owner is more personally important. #
  • @chrisgarrett huh. we were just talking about ALICE yesterday. I heard she was a bitch. looks like it fits your theory #
  • @chrisgarrett it goes back to at least the 19th http://tinyurl.com/3b2s96 #
  • When I read about the internet being an instrument for social destruction I think "good, there’s a lot of cleaning up to do" #
  • @chrisgarrett omg, no wonder you’re so up in arms, these strumpette people can kiss my ass. paranoids. #
  • Riddle me this: how can you espouse your negative opinions about the internet on the internet, and expect any respect? #
  • I’m not so sure that a luddite, pro-expert, pro-professional should be arguing on twitter. it screams hypocrite #
  • @chrisgarrett you have to be published on dead trees or harass someone who’s been on tv to be pro, duh #
  • Editor’s note: man I was a twitter whore today. cut for length.
    Read the rest of this entry »

Comments

The Death of the Luddities?

Jason Calcanis was recently quoted as saying “As Internet people we shoudn’t bother with people who don’t understand the Internet because they’ll be dead soon.”

Oh Jason. How painfully untrue that is. If he knew half the young people I’ve met, and work with, he would be appalled at how undereducated young people are about the internet and computers. Unless he’s saying that there’s going to be some kind of special plague that only kills people who don’t know that “lolcats” are old meme, and that domaining really is a word.

No, Mr. Calcanis. We still have to suck up to these pre-internet types. There are just too many of them to stage a real coup at this point. You’ll just have to deal like the rest of us.

Comments

I Have No Idea What You’re Talking About…

So here’s someone melting chocolate bunnies instead.

P.S. The minimalist, haunting tune is really what makes this worthwhile, if you ask me.

Comments

Speaking of Analysis

Thanks to the magic of RSS, and the writings of Wired’s copy chief, Tony Long (aka The Luddite), I’ve discovered a major media political analyst whose statements I actually find worthwhile during this time of discussion on the events of September 11th 2001.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/
Keith Olbermann, of MSNBC news of all places, has a few articles up right now that really impressed me. I tend to dodge the news, as it’s typically rather depressing, highly skewed in ways I have to question, and generally not useful. While these articles are undoubtedly skewed, they are skewed with the air of human opinion, instead of reeking of propaganda. While these are depressing, they are also hopeful, because they’re written with the idea that Americans are not the sheep we’re being made out to be. The usefulness is dependant wholly upon the impact and reach of the article. It reached me, and I’m spreading it. The impact on me was immediate and profound.

A lot of people have been writing about the anniversary of the destruction of the World Trade Center, part of the Pentagon, and the planes which were destroyed during this series of attacks. Mostly, where they were on the day. I know right where I was. I can’t forget, it was a huge event that no one in America could realistically avoid.

In the article “This hole in the ground”, Olbermann addresses not so much the event but the national progress since then. In our dedication to the adage-nouveau “Never Forget” some of us - a lot of us - have elected to focus solely on the event. Which is understandable to a degree, it was horrific, it hurt a lot of people directly and indirectly. The circles of effect that radiate out from that series of assaults runs far and fierce, there’s no question there. However, the history of what has occured as a result of these particular incidents is just as important to address - if not more so - than the original events themselves. I recommend reading beyond that particular article as well; it illustrates my point better than I probably could myself.

Where are we going?
What are we doing?
Who is driving?
What do they want?
What do WE want?
Who among us will stand/are standing for the desires of the majority?
What is accomplished by fear?

Comments

ClickHeat : track clicks